November 29th, 2009
I used to read a lot of Alfred North Whitehead (process philosophy, anyone?), but I’ve never read a lot (any) of Bertrand Russell. Logicomix, by Apostolos Doxiadis and Christos H. Papadimitriou was a great introduction to Russell’s significant contributions to logic, mathematics and philosophy. It covers neither his whole life nor all of his writings, just one great story about his personal drive to isolate with certainty the logical foundations of mathematics and what that drive did to him and to the related fields of study. Along the way, the reader meets Whitehead, Hilbert, Wittgenstein, Godel and many others. The graphic novel is humorously self-referential, has a great notebook at the end which should be referenced often as you’re going through the text, and does a good job of getting across the aspect of the part of Russell’s life in which the authors are the most interested. There are a few out-of-place (or completely misunderstood by me) plugs for a sequel at the end of the novel, but other than that it was a great story. As a former math major, a former fan of Whitehead and a consistent non-reader of Principia Mathematica, I had fun reading Logicomix. The content of the story would have made a good text-based article, but seeing the art and following the conversations through the timing of the panels added to my enjoyment of the story.
To view the art, read more about the creative team, get a feel for the pace of the book and preview the contents of the notebook (see Cast of Characters and Topics, under About Logicomix), check out the Logicomix homepage.
Tags: Logic, Philosophy
Posted in Book Review | No Comments »
November 22nd, 2009
Just a brief foray back into the self-restricted world of fiction.
Stieg Larsson showed up on my radar a month or two ago on a list of authors to read instead of Dan Brown. Then The Economist ran a positive review of his Millennium Trilogy last month. I started The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo on Wednesday and could not put it down. What a page-turner. I found an export paperback copy of The Girl Who Played with Fire in the Mexico City airport yesterday and finished it today. I agree with the critics. These are fascinating thrillers with complex characters, intriguing plot lines, and some very disturbing images. Incredible. Not sure how long I can hold out before I have to read some edition of The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest.
We now return to our regularly scheduled, non-fiction programming.
Tags: Fiction
Posted in Book Review | 1 Comment »
November 20th, 2009
I heard about Zachary Shore’s Blunder: Why Smart People Make Bad Decisions via an interview with the author by D.J. Grothe on his Point of Inquiry podcast. Shore approaches the problem of cognition traps (his term for the different types of errors we make when trying to make decisions) as an historian. His descriptions of the different traps are followed by historical examples of how the traps have led to bad decisions and/or how particular historical figures have avoided certain traps. Shore’s end notes were helpful and his writing style was fairly easy to follow, once I got over his neologisms. He covers seven types of cognition traps: exposure anxiety, causefusion (confusing the causes of complex events), flatview, cure-allism, infomania (both hording and avoiding), mirror imaging and static cling. Several of these traps overlap each other in terms of some of their underlying causes (hope I’m not causefusing things here….);for example, flatview and static cling both derive their particular “badness” from a black-and-white view of the world. That said, I appreciated Shore taking the time to point out the finer details and differences amongst the traps. Recognizing a trap and finding the best way to avoid it depend on the ability to identify the different manifestations of restricted thinking.
The penultimate chapter covers the mistakes of the Iraq War in terms of cognition traps. Given Shore’s tendency to use examples from throughout the history of mankind, these Iraq War examples seem a bit premature. They may be “timely” ways to help teach the subject, but that’s all the reader should take them for. The last chapter provides advice for avoiding all the cognition traps. Shore uses two very interesting true stories to point out the benefits of mental flexibility.
This is not “The one book you must read to completely understand cognitive errors,” but it is a nice complement to the science-based titles I’ve read so far. Shore is not a scientist (as he clearly states and as some of his stories and suggestions clearly show), but his perspective on how to define, recognize and avoid poor thinking from the viewpoint of an historian is very interesting and helpful.
Tags: Cognitive Science
Posted in Book Review | No Comments »
November 1st, 2009
In October, our book club read Leonard Wibberley’s The Mouse that Roared
. I chose this book to help us ease into the non-book meetings in November and December, and because I had a vague memory from having read it over thirty years ago (yes, it scares me to write that) that it contained some concepts pertinent to our interests. My ancient memory did not let me down this time. We had a great discussion of the book, covering many of the subjects we’ve been talking about since we started up in the summer of 2008 : minority rights v. majority rule, the economic connections amongst nation states, the balance between diplomatic and military actions, human behavior towards the out-group, cultural representations of diplomats and the efficacy of nuclear weapons verification programs, to name a few.
We also discussed the power of the meme of The Mouse That Roared, by sharing articles each of us had found that were related to some interest other than diplomacy, and that used the meme of The Mouse That Roared. From golfing to intelligence to genetics to marketing to you-name-it, the meme of a small entity having a large effect is still very popular (and broadly applied with varying precision).
I’m not sure many of us will rush out to read the sequels or watch the Peter Sellers movie version, but the book was fun to read and fun to discuss. It was also the last book that I will discuss with the book club here. By the time the January meeting takes place, we will have departed sunny Mexico. I’ve really enjoyed every meeting of the Juareaderz, and I thank everyone who made the meetings so pleasant and stimulating.
Tags: Diplomacy, Fiction
Posted in Book Review | 2 Comments »
November 1st, 2009
Sunday morning we enjoyed the final two presentations, prior to heading back to sunny Mexico. Jonathan Kirsch gave a very interesting, very scary presentation on the Long Shadow of the Inquisition. He defined the Inquisitorial Toolbox as set of techniques, thoughts and methods that had been defined during the original Inquisition and that are still in use by the Church and by governments around the world today. He pointed out that the Inquisition caused suffering due to habit of mind (i.e., the Cathars were persecuted because they did not believe in transubstantiation) and that only Christians were persecuted (although once a Jew or Muslim converted to Christianity for any reason……..they were fair game too). Kirsch, too, was on an book tour. Although in the Q&A session he recommended his God Against the Gods: The History of the War Between Monotheism and Polytheism
as his best book overall, he told us he’d prefer it if we’d all buy a copy of his newest book (from which the material for the presentation was taken), The Grand Inquisitor’s Manual: A History of Terror in the Name of God
. Kirsch gave several example of tools from the Inquisitorial Toolbox being used today and pointed out that the power of being able to persecute someone based solely on the fact that they had different ideas or thoughts still came in quite handy for Authorities of all types. He ended his presentation with a powerful story about watching Arthur Miller’s The Crucible on Broadway right after 9/11.
Richard Dawkins introduced the final speaker, Eugenie Scott, as a hero in the fight for teaching science in the science classroom and as someone he admired greatly. This was very interesting to me, given the amount of discussion in the blogosphere of late re the accommodationist stance of the Scott’s National Center for Science Education. Scott made no reference to this in her presentation: Creationism: Still Crazy After All These Years. She gave a brief review of the history of creationism and intelligent design attacks on evolution in the classroom, then focused on current tactics including “teach the controversy” and the “either/or” approach. She pointed out that attacking evolution is just the tip of the iceberg. Attacking evolution is attacking materialistic science. Attacking materialistic science is attacking materialism (non-dualism). Kind of a scary thought, given the subject matter of Kirsch’s presentation right before this. She closed her presentation with some pretty sobering stories about what’s going on in Texas right now with their science textbooks. Currently, the creationists are abusing the meaning of the phrase “academic freedom” as one means to try to teach religion in the science classroom. Since Texas purchases so many textbooks, what they choose to purchase is usually what all the other states have to purchase. So the content of the science textbooks chosen by Texas has a huge effect on science education all over the US.
Conference Summary: This was a great conference. The speaker list was incredible. Everything else about the conference was fine, but it was the caliber of the speakers that really set this conference apart from the last few TAM’s (for instance). For me, it was fun to see many of my favorite thinkers and authors in the flesh and it was very stimulating to listen to them in the context of this conference. Very refreshing. I’ll close with some random links (of variable value) to other bloggers’ thoughts on the convention: Linda Ward Selbie, Jerry Coyne, Russell Blackford, PZ Myers, Humanist Network News, Kate Lovelady and Jim Lippard.
Tags: Evolution, Religion
Posted in Critical Thinking | 1 Comment »