In 2004, a consultant from SUNY who was working on legislative reform in Mexico City highly recommended Ambassador Jeffrey Davidow‘s recently-published The Bear and the Porcupine: The U.S. and Mexico
Davidow’s testimony, as he calls it, covers his tenure as U.S. Ambassador to Mexico from 1998 to 2002. Vicente Fox’s election as President in 2000, Fox’s relationship with President Bush, the two dominant issues of drug trafficking and immigration, and the effects of 9/11 on Mexico-U.S. relations were the most interesting parts of the book for me reading it this week; but Davidow also provides insights into personalities in the recent and current Mexican administrations, does a thoughtful job of explaining the tensions between our two societies and tells a lot of great stories. Throughout the book, he consistently praises and criticizes both countries, based on his knowledge of events. The one main area where he seemed particularly interested in only criticizing one element was in regard to the Mexican press. He does not like them, and the reader finds many examples throughout the book of their no-good nature.
Davidow is a funny writer, the kind you wish you could sit down and have a few margaritas with. The book was favorably reviewed in Foreign Affairs and there is a revised edition that includes updates on U.S.-Mexico relations and comments on the 2006 presidential election in Mexico. A Spanish translation of the book was also published in 2004. While I was reading the book in English, I kept wondering what Mexican readers would think of Davidow’s bluntness. It’s obvious that he and his wife love Mexico and that he worked hard to improve bi-lateral relations, but I’d be curious to know how his informal writing style and blend of praise and shame come across to a reader from Mexico (in either language really).
. The manager had just finished reading it and thought it would be interesting and pertinent to us. I agree. It provided a very clear explanation of the responses of the Bush Administration and Congress to 9/11 in terms of how our borders are managed. As someone who wasn’t paying close attention until a few years ago, this book was very helpful because it explained the immediate past history of INS and Customs, the time line of the creation of and changes in DHS, the players, the recurring motifs, the political motivations and the interactions between DHS, the White House, Congress, DOS and enforcement and intelligence agencies.
later this month. This title was chosen based on an unconfirmed recommendation from someone who does not attend the meetings. Oops. The book is terrible. I’m sure the author is a dedicated journalist and a human who is very concerned about the violent, mortal tragedies that occurred in Ciudad Juárez . I hope that her investigative work and other activities helped bring about the punishment of some/any of the guilty and brought some comfort to the families of the murdered girls. I also hope someone in the book club will be able to recommend a better (or just good) book on the terrible murders of young women here.
. My new friend told me that Danelo recently traveled the entire US-Mexico border and had recorded his observations along the way. My friend, a counter-insurgency wonk, said that Danelo was interested in the similarities between the insurgents in Iraq and the narcotraficantes in Mexico; sadly, there is not much in